No | Text |
1 | Main page |
No | Text |
1 | Mental health law online |
No | Text |
1 | Stay up to date |
2 | Recent updates |
3 | Jobs |
4 | Cpd |
5 | Magic book |
6 | Events |
7 | Books |
8 |
No | Text |
1 | Rss feeds |
No | Text |
1 | Suicide and homicide report. |
2 | Case (Article 2 inquests and community patients). (2) |
3 | Conclusion of s2 listing window consultation. |
4 | 12 hours for £60 |
5 | More books... |
No | Text |
1 | The coroner, following the Administrative Court decision that she had failed properly to address the Article 2 operational duty as set out in the Rabone case, in this decision sets out reasons for concluding that (a) the operational duty was not neither engaged nor breached. |
2 | The coroner had decided that Article 2 was not engaged in this case, which involved the death of a community patient who was not subject to the MHA. (1) In relation to the operational duty, the coroner's decision had focussed almost exclusively on the question of responsibility rather than the "threefold factors of a***umed responsibility, vulnerability and risk" set out in the Rabone case. The matter was remitted to the coroner for reconsideration. (2) The grounds which related to systemic failures were unarguable. |
3 | Follow the coronavirus regulations and Government advice. |